Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Freeing Jewish Prisoners

Peace Now has called on the Prime Minister to immediately remove from the Knesset's agenda any discussion about the initiative to free Arab prisoners within the framework the the Shalit Deal. "The deal is difficult enough for Israel, and there is no reason to add additional risk to Israel's citizen's by releasing Arab terrorists to the streets," said Peace Now's Director, Yariv Oppenheimer. The left's proposal is immoral and represents a warped worldview that allows attacking and killing Jews. NRG-Maariv.
Interesting to see a moral position from Peace Now about the legitimacy of releasing terrorists.
It's a shame that Peace Now didn't actually say the above, rather they said the release of "Jewish Terrorists" was immoral and represents a warped worldview. Interesting how they have no problem at all release Arab murderers, but not Jewish ones...

I would think that the only way to add any morality to the release of Arab murderers, would be to release Jewish ones as well.

Hagai Segal writes an interesting Op-Ed piece in YNET on the subject:
When a murderer is sentenced to 36 life sentences but is being released after barely eight years, it becomes clear that verdicts around here are not binding. The judges wrote something, so what?

For lack of other choice, what is left to do now is to at least adhere to the principle of equality before the law, or more accurately, equality before the absence of law. A mass release of Arab terrorists requires us to embark on a parallel release of Jewish security prisoners. It isn’t nice and it isn’t pretty, but it’s necessary.

If Israel is strong enough to cope with the release of 1,000 Hamas members, [Jameel adds; actually, they were also from Fatah, and some were Israeli Arabs] it is also strong enough to contend with the mitigated sentences of Jews who harmed Arabs. In this case we are not dealing with 1,000 prisoners, and not even with 450, but rather, with only 12 of them.

As opposed to the Arab prisoners released in the swap, believe me when I say that there is no danger that the freed Jewish inmates would ever take up arms again. The overwhelming majority spent a much longer period in jail than most of the recently freed archenemies sent to Judea and Samaria or to Gaza.

Ami Popper has been behind bars for much longer than the female terrorist behind the Sbarro restraint bombing, while members of the Bat Ayin underground were imprisoned many years before the architect of the Café Moment bombing. Other prisoners include soldiers and police officers whose actions marked a momentary lapse, rather than the result of a lengthy conspiracy or membership in a subversive group.

Shin Bet officials would surely say that in this era of “price tag” we must not pardon Popper or the Bat Ayin group, but these officials are supposed to realize that the most effective way to uproot the “price tag” phenomenon is to put out the fires of frustration that give rise to this trend. When 1,027 Arab terrorists go home with the Shin Bet’s approval, yet Yoram Cohen insists on keeping the handful of Jewish inmates in prison, the frustration merely grows. Hence, we should free them at once. This too is part of the intolerable price of the Shalit swap. (YNET)
.

Visiting Israel?
Learn to Shoot at
Caliber-3 with top Israeli Anti-Terror Experts!


Follow the Muqata on Twitter.

Wherever I am, my blog turns towards Eretz Yisrael טובה הארץ מאד מאד

5 comments:

NormanF said...

Israel must release all Kahanist political prisoners and lift the ban on Kach and Kahane Chai.

What's the moral difference between Arab and Jewish prisoners?

The Jews haven't killed a single Jew!

Its time to end the discrimination and restore justice for Jews!

Anonymous said...

I really hope that was sarcastic but with the kookoos who read your blog you never know..

Anonymous said...

Scary comment, Norman. I don't think he's being facetious.
You know, in the U.S., when someone is really annoyed with a newspaper or a news source, do you know what we do? We stop reading it or clicking on it.
Maybe that would be a better strategy than constantly quoting and complaining about Haaretz. All you're doing is increasing it's readership and Internet traffic.
Oh, it's also extremely divisive and pits one segment of the population against another. Demonization.
Just something to consider.

Jameel @ The Muqata said...

Anonymous: Trust me, more "kookoos" read Haaretz (and comment there) than at the Muqata.

Anonymous said...

That doesn't really address what I said. Haaretz may have its own nuts, but you keep reading it and attacking it. Just ignore it. You probably caused at least 50 people to read their website who normally wouldn't.
Not to mention the fact that your time might be better spent trying to find a way to bridge the gap between right and left instead of widening it. Factionalization is really in no one's interest in the long run.
Just one reader's opinion.

Search the Muqata

Loading...

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails