Monday, September 04, 2006

Justice Unhinged.

Reading an op-ed piece like this makes my blood boil.

Samir Kuntar is a monster. He may never have deserved a life.

It's time we let him out of prison.

Not for his sake. For ours.

For the sake of three families.

Haaretz never ceases to amaze me.

Their writers don't challenge, they provoke. Their reporters don't tantalize, they goad. And their editorials, representative of a very narrow minority opinion, shout out from their pages, pretending to be the moral compass for Israel.

In ways that cannot be counted, most of which went unnoticed by the media and the world, the one institution that got Israel through the war was the family.

The family may be the one thing Israel has ever gotten right.

It is surely the one thing that saves Israel from itself.

It may be the only thing that matters.

Sounds acceptable? Haaretz is just reeling you in for catch.

It was families that gave shelter, food, and support to thousands of Israelis in the north routed from their homes by Katyusha rockets. It was families that gave their soldier children, soldier spouses, soldier brothers and sisters, soldier fathers and even grandfathers, the strength to keep on, despite their betrayal by the befuddlement of their government and their generals.

Before the war began, young men from three of these families were patrolling Israel's borders, Israel's pre-1967 war borders, on Israeli soil, when gunmen from Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, invaded and took them hostage.

We owe it to their families to get them back. We owe it to their brothers in arms, as well, to do everything it takes to get them back. Soldiers and their families have to know that their leaders will risk their very political careers, if need be, to pay the price to get them back.

Even if I disagree, one should be able to argue that negotiations with terrorists to return hostages is a viable option...but Haaretz goes on...

The price will be awful. The price to families will be awful. In the case of Gilad Shalit, kidnapped on June 25, the price may be 1,000 or more Palestinian prisoners, some guilty of having tried to murder Israelis, some perhaps guilty of having succeeded. The families of Israeli victims of terrorism will fall victim to a new phase of torture.

In the case of Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev, abducted by Hezbollah on July 12, the price will be even worse. It will include the release of Samir Kuntar. In 1979, Kuntar led a group of gunmen on an attack in Nahariya, during which broke into an apartment and took hostage Danny Haran, 28, and his four-year-old daughter, Einat.

"I will never forget the joy and the hatred in their voices as they swaggered about hunting for us, firing their guns and throwing grenades," Danny's wife, Smadar, wrote three years ago in an account in the Washington Post, describing in part how she hid from the terrorists with her other daughter, Yael, just two.

"I knew that if Yael cried out, the terrorists would toss a grenade into the crawl space and we would be killed. So I kept my hand over her mouth, hoping she could breathe. As I lay there, I remembered my mother telling me how she had hidden from the Nazis during the Holocaust. "This is just like what happened to my mother," I thought.

"As police began to arrive, the terrorists took Danny and Einat down to the beach. There, according to eyewitnesses, one of them shot Danny in front of Einat so that his death would be the last sight she would ever see. Then he smashed my little girl's skull in against a rock with his rifle butt. That terrorist was Samir Kuntar.

"By the time we were rescued from the crawl space, hours later, Yael, too, was dead. In trying to save all our lives, I had smothered her."

So what's my problem with this article? The bombshell is in the next line:

Samir Kuntar is our hostage.

Excuse me?

Samir Kuntar is our hostage.

Are you insane?

Samir Kuntar is our hostage.

What moral equivalence are you drawing between the lives of our IDF soldiers and the bloodthirsty terrorist, Samir Kuntar? Our hostage???

Samir Kuntar is our hostage. His release will do great injury to all those who loved and love Danny and Einat Haran. But it's time that he be released.

It's a moral issue pitting families against families. But we cannot ignore the families of the living, and of the living themselves.

Last week, in response to the direct appeals of the families of Gilad, Ehud, and Eldad, Israelis by the tens of thousands flooded the heart of Tel Aviv to appeal to the Ehud Olmert to do everything he could to secure their release.

There had never been a demonstration like it. The rally brought together the activist right and left, the solid center, the secular hip, the settler religious, the haredi, the elderly, the newborn in a sling, the Shenkenite, the professor, the frecha, the arss.

The rally had nothing to do with freeing Samir Kuntar, and to infer that the unity of the rally means that there was unified support to release a terrorist, is abhorrent.

Wait, you may say -- but this Op-Ed piece agrees that Kuntar is a monster....he just needs to be released to secure the freedom of our soldiers...

Read on:

In the end, it will be pressure from families, from Palestinian families, from Lebanese families, from Syrian families, from Israelis families, that will turn the tide in favor of peace in this region.

This is our fate, our curse, and, perhaps, our only hope: The structures of Israel, Lebanon, and the Palestinian Authority may bear the trappings of modern government, but they remain fundamentally tribal societies.


So that's it in a nutshell. We are all families...and that is our hope for peace.

The families of Palestinian terrorists, Lebanese terrorists, and Syrian terrorists are all "families", just like the families of kidnapped IDF soldiers.

The terrorists who teach their children to hate, to blow themselves up, to wish for jihad against the Jews...Haaretz equates those families with the parents of IDF soldiers.

Haaretz makes a mockery of justice and advocates the adage that crime pays.

Golda Meir was wrong; She said, "There will only be peace when the Arabs love their children more than they hate us."

What she meant to say was, "There will only be peace in Israel when we love our soldiers and civilians more than we love the enemy." **


** From Zeev Galili in Makor Rishon this past weekened.

Wherever I am, my blog turns towards Eretz Yisrael

13 comments:

JoeSettler said...

Then Yigal Amir is a hostage too, to eventually be traded for something.

I guess Omri Sharon (remember him?) will be a hostage when he eventually goes to jail, to be traded for something when the remnants of the Sharon family wants him freed.

Ehud Olmert too?

When someone has no morals and can say we should free terrorists because we are only keeping them in jail as hostages as opposed to either punishing them, or keeping them locked up so they can't commit more evil acts then anything becomes possible, permissable, and even desirable.

It's unfortunate that the Israel of Entebee has been replace by the Israel of Peres. Peace at any price and at all costs - even if it doesn't bring Peace at all.

Lawyer-Wearing-Yarmulka said...

Explain to me why Israel doesn't have the death penalty for terrorists?

Why is Kuntar even alive?

Rafi G. said...

what I do nto understand is why we are so committed to negotiating hundreds and thousands for the return fo 1 (or 3). If Kuntar is so important to them, let's trade 1 for one. Why one for thousands? Why do we have it in our head that we have to give thousands back? Let the negotiators say (assuming we are negotiating) you want kuntar, give us shalit. That is it. nothing more nothing less.

Jameel @ The Muqata said...

CWY: Israel does not have a death penalty for terrorists for 2 reasons: (Both are very sad).

1. Israel was worried that terrorsist would kill Israeli civlians in retaliation for killing terrorists (before Olso, kidnappings were much more popular and didn't always involve killing hostages...). Since Olso, and the suicide mentality evolved among Palestinians, this entire reason is worthless. Most terrorists assume they will be killed in their attacks.

2. This reason is alot worse (if that's even possible): Israel's refusal to mete out the death penalty to terrorists stems from the fear that maybe the Palestinian cause is just...

tafka PP said...

You may be shocked to hear this from me, but I think you are absolutely right about Haaretz- they are too consumed with their own self-importance to remember how to actually go about reporting news- their political agenda notwithstanding. I've stopped reading them too, for that reason- but every time I check their site, there is a new column which surprises me in it's *********. (I won't use the term I've come to call it here, as this is a family blog ;-) )

But don't worry, our concurrence will be short-lived- I don't agree with your use of that quote to support your analysis of what "Haaretz" or "The Left" thinks. Tragically, I think Golda was more on the money.

AMSHINOVER said...

As Bialik said
if only the
עַם-חָכָם וְנָבוֹן,
had a little bit of Say'chel

Batya said...

How many more must be murdered before they'll understand?

Ben Ami said...

somehow, someway, they must learn that we don't do business with human lives. so long as we trade and barter, they'll keep kidnapping. when they realize we don't ransom hostages, they'll stop taking them.

shoot the hostage. lose the battle. win the war.

ravyehoshua said...

Jameel, I don't agree with your assertion that the reason we don't have a death penalty here is because some people think maybe the enemy's cause is just. That is, I agree that today there are too many people (one is too many in my book) in places of power and influence who either think this consciously, or have it lurking in their subconsious. But the reason, I suspect, is because the self-proclaimed founders who shaped the dominent public culture in Israel saw the society they wished to create as a society which was "beyond" the death penalty - a morally superior society. In "morally superior" Europe, there is no death penalty, and that's who our "leaders" have always deferred to as their moral compass. So it has less to do with the Arabs and much more to do with the failure of vision which imagined a socialist paradise that even the Europeans don't believe in anymore. We're always the last to give up our desperate clinging to any redemptive ideology other than Judaism.

Jameel @ The Muqata said...

RavYehoshua: Then why does Israel have the death penalty for Nazis?

As a "a morally superior society" there wouldn't be any excuse to execute Nazis who "were just following orders"...

Tzvi Meir & Ayala said...

no words...

Jameel @ The Muqata said...

Posted on behalf of a reader:

Monday, September 04, 2006
Justice Unhinged.
Golda may have been right THEN, but now there is a
different wind blowing thru the M.E.

Someone brought that out this past Shabbos, speaking about Hagar (an Egyptian princess) and Yishmael. She put him an 'arrow's distance' from her because she didn't have the love, courage, morality to comfort him in his distress and possible death. It was Hashem that
came to him after he did some teshuva.

That arrow is the symbol of his playfulness and his answer to all situations. The Egyptian princess
infused in her future Yishmaelites (and other eastern peoples) the ability for the women to sacrifice their children to death. This is their concept of "family."

Think about it for a while. This is a Torah source for that abhorrent trait.

So, this guy who wrote the Haaretz piece, knows nothing!

By Neshama

Lion of Zion said...

Jameel:

"Then why does Israel have the death penalty for Nazis?"

It's easy to have a "morally objectionable" law knowing that it will never be applied. I wonder if the law was originally codified merely as a symbolic statement. How many Nazis did Israel's early jurists actually expect to be brought to justice in Israel? Indeed, how many Nazis have been prosecuted in Israek and was anyone ever executed other than Eichman? I'm also willing to bet that the this law was the product of the survivor's generation and that today Israel would never actually execute even a top Nazi.

In any case, the lack of a death penalty for terrorists is simple. Israel is afraid of the public relations backlash not because it was executing the death penalty, but because they were executing a poor, peace-loving Palestinian freedom fighter.

Search the Muqata

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails